Posted on

Randy Altschuler on Faith and Mandates

President Obama’s decision to force Catholic organizations to provide insurance plans for their employees that cover services like contraception – despite the fact that doing so would violate a major tenet of their faith – continues a callous disregard for our constitutionally-protected religious freedoms under this administration.

Likewise, incumbent Congressman Tim Bishop’s failure to break from the President and stand up for his Catholic constituents when I challenged him to do so, highlight Tim Bishop’s unfortunate legacy as a hyper-partisan, career politician who doesn’t have the courage to speak out against his own party bosses and put his Suffolk County constituents first.

Bishop’s continued silence and rigid partisanship persisted even as scores of his fellow Democrats, including liberals like Massachusetts Senator John Kerry, publicly called on President Obama to cease his attack on religious freedoms. Bishop only briefly broke his silence to release a cynical and misleading statement attempting to turn this issue into a referendum on access to contraception.

Make no mistake, the issue at hand is not access to contraception, but rather Tim Bishop’s blind support for ObamaCare and its big government mandates, even when they violate our constitutionally-protected religious freedoms.

While Congressman Bishop largely sat on the sidelines, I engaged on this issue publicly, calling on President Obama to find a solution and encouraging him and Mr. Bishop to support legislation by Florida Senator Marco Rubio, “The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 2012.” Senator Rubio’s legislation would have established a firm religious exemption to the aforementioned insurance mandate under ObamaCare by simply stating that the federal government can’t force religious organizations to abandon the fundamental tenets of their faith. It can’t be any more common sense than that.

Naturally, Senator Rubio’s legislation hasn’t moved, proving that “common sense in Washington” is truly an oxymoron.

While I am sure this particular debate will continue in the days and weeks to come, the larger fight here is really about the damaging effects of ObamaCare and Congressman Bishop’s insistent belief that his vote for a big government takeover of our healthcare system was the right thing to do despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Tim Bishop and other ObamaCare supporters promised ObamaCare would lower healthcare costs; they were wrong. They promised ObamaCare would not result in big government mandates; they were wrong. They promised that ObamaCare would not infringe upon constitutionally protected rights of religious freedom; and now they are being proved wrong on that, too.

When is enough going to be enough?

Congressman Bishop’s blind spot on ObamaCare harkens back to his disastrous stretch of public town halls in 2009, when thousands of Suffolk County taxpayers literally pleaded with him face-to-face, asking him to oppose this legislation. As you will remember, he responded then by thumbing his nose at all of us and helping President Obama and Nancy Pelosi ram through this costly expansion of the federal government’s size and power.

Now, nearly three years later, as the consequences of his actions become more and more apparent, will Congressman Bishop finally admit that ObamaCare is bad law? Will he finally admit that it should be repealed and replaced immediately with reforms that eliminate these intrusive government mandates and actually lower healthcare costs for individuals, families, seniors and small businesses here in Suffolk County?

Unfortunately, given Tim Bishop’s track record on this issue, I’m not holding my breath.

Randy Altschuler is the Republican nominee candidate for the 1st congressional district.

NOTE: I inadvertently said “nominee” instead of “candidate,” and while he has been endorsed by both the Suffolk Republican and Conservative parties, he isn’t the nominee yet. I apologize to any of his opponent’s supporters who may have been offended by the error.


4 responses to “Randy Altschuler on Faith and Mandates

  1. samJ ⋅

    Randy Altschuler is not the Republican nominee – he is endorsed by the Suffolk County Republican committee – we won’t know who the nominee is until after election day – please include facts in baised reporting – i know facts are stubborn things

    • Brodigan

      People being jerks in the comment section of blogs are stubborn things as well, but I corrected the inadvertent single word mistake.

    • Rachel Torres ⋅

      You know what else is stubborn? Grammar. However, we use it anyway. Perhaps people wouldn’t think you the pretentious jerk that you are if you could semi-eloquently make your non-existent point.

  2. Brodigan, I’ll let it slide this time but if you f*ck up once more, I’m going to petition Obama to appoint a Grammar Czar!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s